Transparency in commodity trading is crucial |
Swiss
companies dominate global physical commodity trading. This places a unique
responsibility on the Swiss government to require these companies operate in a
transparent and responsible manner. Bloomberg reports Switzerland
is "the world’s leading commodities trading hub, accounting for about 35
per cent of global physical oil trade and a 60 per cent of metals and
minerals." This amounts to more than $3 trillion in world trade, according
to Al-Jazeera.
The
government of Switzerland recently ducked an important opportunity to protect
against the potentially damaging effects of opaque deals between its companies
and commodity-producing countries. On March 27, 2013, following months of
debate within government, a cross-departmental body finally issued its report to the Federal Council on
the country’s commodity sector. The report was meant to outline the associated
risks and suggest appropriate policy responses. Instead (as explained further by Swiss NGOs),
it offered vague suggestions and placed too much confidence in voluntary
international mechanisms rather than binding national regulation.
Swiss
trading companies—which include energy giants Trafigura, Glencore and
Vitol—have attracted scrutiny of late, due to the sector's explosion in size over the last 10 years, the Iraq Oil-for-Food scandal,
and, as the Financial Times reports, "increasing public resentment in
Switzerland towards highly paid executives and bankers."
The
poverty, corruption and weak governance prevalent in many resource producing
countries has led transparency advocates like RWI to call for stricter
reporting standards of commodity sales. For
example, Glencore was just awarded the license to buy oil from the
government of Chad. In late January, the company lifted its first cargo of
950,000 barrels. This single sale would net at least $80 million. This may be a
small- or medium-sized deal for Glencore, but for a poor country like Chad,
this is a massive transaction. The revenues from this single sale are enough to
pay for half of the country’s yearly education budget.
Without the disclosure
of basic information around commodity sales, corruption risks increase, and
there is little chance for citizens, journalists and parliaments to know how
much their country receives for its public resources.
In
its announcement Wednesday, the Swiss government said it would rely on global
standards such as the Extractive Industries
Transparency Initiative (EITI) and various U.N. mechanisms
to police its commodity companies. These standards are useful, but
insufficient. The report heralds the EITI, and frames Swiss support for the
initiative as the major plank of its efforts to promote transparency. But EITI
is only a voluntary initiative and not implemented by many resource-producing
countries with major corruption and governance problems, like Angola,
Equatorial Guinea and Turkmenistan.
To
promote consistent transparency, governments which host extractive companies
should regulate reporting by the companies based within its borders. The U.S.
and the EU are taking such steps through Section 1504 of the
Dodd-Frank Act and forthcoming EU regulations respectively.
The Swiss, rather than follow suit, said they would revisit this issue later.
Should this occur, commodity trading (rather
than just extraction) must be at the center of the discussions. Otherwise, such
a law would be a largely symbolic gesture that avoids the biggest part of the
Swiss sector.
Requiring companies to
operate in a transparent and responsible manner does not constitute unfair or
uncompetitive treatment. Trading companies are huge global players that buy
billions of dollars of oil and minerals from poor countries. Wherever they are
headquartered in the world, they should be the subject of robust oversight and
scrutiny. Ensuring this is the case is a basic responsibility of the home
government, and one which the Swiss should not avoid.
**Stephen Yeboah participated in the Swissaid workshop in Geneva this year on Transparency in the Extractive Sector: the role of Commodity Superpower Switzerland.
No comments:
Post a Comment