Thursday 5 September 2013

Breaking the affinity with secrecy in Africa’s extractive sector: G20 Summit and expectant reforms

“The G20 cannot afford to miss another opportunity to end illicit practices like tax evasion, transfer mispricing and capital flights that multinational companies engage in. These practices are stifling the ability of developing countries especially in Africa to finance development that trickles down to the poor.”

The subject on transparency in the extractive industry has extensively been discussed. The campaign drive for transparency in the past decade to make contracts and revenue flows in the oil, gas and mining industry open has been intense. Global transparency campaign has succeeded in prompting and facilitating historic reforms that seek to fade out secret deals especially in the extractive industry. The G8 in its recent meeting joined the fight but with not too impressive outcome. The G8 put forward measures to clamp down on tax evasion and illegal capital flights which thrive in ‘darkness’. David Cameron indicated in June that the time had come to insist on greater transparency from resource-extracting companies, in order to “lift the veil of secrecy that too often lets corrupt corporations and officials in some countries run rings around the law”.

But the results have still been modest. That there are still billions of dollars being lost through tax avoidance and evasion must be the concern now. On September 5 and 6, leaders of the G20 are expected to agree on, inter alia, a reform to fight evasion by multinational companies. Of course, there could be no right time than this particular moment. The issue at hand is staggering. This is no politics. It is about denying both developed and developing countries the opportunity to finance development. In this discussion, developing countries and those in Africa in particular receive the most attention. Why? The Global Financial Integrity indicates that developing countries between lose an estimated $100 billion to $160 billion annually to corporate tax dodging.

Africa is known to suffer the most from tax evasion and transfer mispricing. Africa is hard hit. The Africa Progress Panel, chaired by Mr. Kofi Annan, in its report “Equity in Extractives: stewarding Africa’s natural resources for all” this year gives worrying details. Africa between 2008 and 2010 lost US$38.4 billion through transfer mispricing and illegal capital flights. This together with corruption and mismanagement makes the situation grievous. Governments are increasingly worried. There is growing public discontent regarding these illicit practices that deny people from deserved benefits of development. The G20 Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia ought to deal with the challenge. And there are economic reasons for this.

The extractive industry in Africa is mired in very disturbing paradox. Extensively rich in all kinds of natural resources, Africa still struggles to improve the lives of people. Livelihoods of people have even worsened in these resource-rich countries. Even scandalous is that the right amount of revenues from oil, gas and mining do not reach these governments. Tax evasion, transfer mispricing and other illicit financial practices by multinational extractive companies to evade taxes are to blame.

Transparency, to begin with, must precede all reforms aimed at stopping tax evasion and transfer mispricing commonplace in the oil, gas and mining sectors. These illicit practices by multinational companies only survive in opaque environments. In this sense, there is no denying that global reforms to leverage transparency have been groundbreaking. What are these reforms? In the United States, there is the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. Though this act is being challenged in court by the American Petroleum Institute (API), the largest U.S trade association for the oil and natural gas industry, the Dodd-Frank Act has succeeded in driving other reforms elsewhere. The European parliament this year passed a legislation compelling oil, gas and mining companies to publish payments they make to governments. The parliament issued new transparency rules in the EU Transparency and Accounting Directives. Under this directive, European companies are mandated to publish payments of more than €100,000 made to the government in the country in which they operate, including taxes, royalty payments, and licence fees.

In Switzerland, the Federal Councilor announced in June this year transparency draft law for the entire Swiss commodities sector. Berne Declaration, a Swiss-based NGO, indicates that the extractive activities of all major Swiss commodity companies will most likely be covered by EU and/or U.S. regulations. Aside from these, the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) has encouraged countries especially in Africa to sign up to standards in reporting revenues from oil, gas and mining industries. These reforms have direct bearing on practices in Africa’s extractive industry.

But more needs to be done. Here leaders of the G20 have to take the challenge. Reforms that have happened so far need to be built upon. It is in this transparent environment that broad tax reforms can be instituted. Further reforms to stop tax havens that support activities of companies are needed. The automatic exchange of information set out by the G20 must take into account the conditions in Africa. Critical today is bringing together large partners that will undertake a standardised model that tracks activities of multinational companies. Of course, isolated reform will achieve modest results. This underscore why Africa, which hosts major operations of these companies, must be brought in.  

For far too long, transparent and efficient global tax system has not been given the needed attention it deserves. The G20 cannot afford to miss another painstaking opportunity to end illicit practices like tax evasion, transfer mispricing and capital flights that multinational companies engage in. These practices are stifling the ability of developing countries especially in Africa to finance development that trickles down to the poor. Developed countries as well are affected. Little or no reform to combat tax evasion and transfer mispricing will not only be disappointing but akin to the G20 condoning these practices that exploit developing countries. Stricter reforms with broad implementation strategies must be envisioned.

These reforms promote the good governance that Africa needs. But it must be acknowledged that transparency and tax reforms cannot provide the quick-fix to the menace in extractive industry in Africa. Governments must take the huge responsibility. The Revenue Watch Institute’s 2013 Global Governance Index which measures transparency and accountability in oil, gas and mining sector of 58 countries worldwide reveals that vast majority of countries surveyed fail to meet satisfactory standards in how natural resources are governed. Of the countries categorised as ‘failing’, majority (8 out of 15) is from Africa. They include among others, DR Congo, Mozambique, Cameroon, Libya, and Equatorial Guinea. These standards are exactly what promote good governance of the extractive industry. Governments must strive to improve these governance structures.

Thus internal governance and institutional structures must be given the boost. Taxing systems in Africa must understand the way international tax jurisdictions operate. The capacity of tax authorities must be enhanced for better appreciation of the global tax system. An extractive industry that contributes to equitable and sustainable development and that fights poverty for both today and future generations is what is ideal for Africa. For their part, leaders of the G20 must break this affinity with secrecy that emboldens multinational companies to avoid their simple obligation of paying the right taxes to governments. Essentially, all stakeholders must be held into account.

BY: Stephen Yeboah. He is an academic researcher with experience in agriculture and natural resource governance in Africa. He currently studies at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. [Email: profstephenyeboah@gmail.com]

No comments:

Post a Comment